Fuji Lozada's Fieldnotes

Anthropologist at Davidson College

  • About Fuji
    • c.v.
    • Email me
    • Meet with me
  • Teaching
    • Previously Taught Classes
    • Teaching Style
      • Complex social theory can be said in plain English
      • Social/cultural theory should be relevant
      • Methodology is Important
      • Writing is a form of thinking
        • Writing a strong thesis statement
        • Making an Argument
        • Response Papers
      • Doing your own field-based research is the best way to learn about anthropology
    • Davidson in China
  • Research
    • Projects
    • Abstracts
    • My Work as a Wordle
    • Fieldnotes
      • Ghana
      • Cyberia
      • Youtube Worth Watching
  • Hack College
    • Make the digital work for you
    • Stalking your professors using Outlook
    • Read with an agenda
    • Write a research proposal
    • Outline to make research easier
    • Use theory
    • Write a literature review
    • Structure of an abstract
    • Notes on teaching and learning

Into the Endzone for a Touchdown – what would Miner say?

January 12, 2009 By Fuji

While we’re reading Horace Miner’s classic Nacirema essay, here is more for you to think about.
First, peruse Alan Dundes’ essay “Into the Endzone for a Touchdown: A Psychoanalytic Consideration of American Football” (To get to this link, you need to have access to JSTOR – i.e., you need to be on the Davidson College network). Dundes is not an anthropologist (he is a folklorist), but compare his discussion to what Miner and Rosaldo are saying in our readings for class.
In his classic symbolic analysis of football, Alan Dundes makes an argument that American football is essentially a form of homosexual behavior: “The unequivocal sexual symbolism of the game, as plainly evidenced in folk speech coupled with the fact that all of the participants are male, make it difficult to draw any other conclusion. Sexual acts carried out in thinly disguised symbolic form by, and directed towards, males and males only, would seem to constitute ritual homosexuality” (Dundes 1978: 87). He gets to this conclusion by looking at the idioms and metaphors of football – the way the sport is talked about by people. Here are some examples of his approach:
The object of the game, simply stated, is to get into the opponent’s endzone while preventing the opponent from getting into one’s own endzone. Structurally speaking, this is precisely what is involved in male verbal dueling. One wishes to put one’s opponent down; to “screw” him while avoiding being screwed by him. We can now better understand the appropriateness of the “bottom patting” so often observed among football players. A good offensive or defensive play deserves a pat on the rear end. The recipient has held up his end and has thereby helped protect the collective “end” of the entire team. One pats one’s teammates’ ends, but one seeks to violate the endzone of one’s opponents! (Dundes 1978:81)
The trust one has for one’s own teammates is perhaps signaled by the common postural stance of football players. The so-called three point stance involves bending over in a distinct stooped position with one’s rear end exposed. It is an unusual position (in terms of normal life activities) and it does make one especially vulnerable to attack from behind, that is, vulnerable to a homosexual attack. In some ways, the posture might be likened to what is termed “presenting” among nonhuman primates. Presenting refers to a subordinate animal’s turning its rump towards a higher ranking or dominant one. (Dundes 1978:81)
Even academics with presumably less personal investment in football will probably find the idea implausible if not downright repugnant that American football could be a ritual combat between groups of males attempting to assert their masculinity by penetrating the endzones of their rivals. (Dundes 1978:86)
Dundes, Alan
1978. Into the Endzone for a Touchdown: A Psychoanalytic Consideration of American
Football. Western Folklore, 37(2 ):75-88.
What do you think? What would Miner or Rosaldo say about this?

Filed Under: Anthropology, Classes, Davidson College, Sports


Eriberto P. Lozada Jr. is Associate Dean of Faculty, Professor of Anthropology and Environmental Studies, and Director of the Crosland Center for Teaching & Learning. He is a sociocultural anthropologist who has examined contemporary issues in Chinese society ranging from: religion and politics; food, popular culture and globalization; sports and society issues; and the cultural impact of science and technology. more...

Crosland Center for Teaching & Learning
Davidson College
Davidson, NC 28035 USA

office: Little Library 1005
tel. 704-894-2035
erlozada [at] davidson.edu

Make the digital work for you

Essential Tools (mostly free) (Updated, 16 March 2017) Technological literacy (something I really need to define later) is essential to getting things done in today’s mediated world. There are a lot of useful applications out there that will cut back on the tears or punched walls late in the semester. Below are some of the […]

Meet with Me

RSS shanghaiist

  • Travelers from 8 more countries will be quarantined upon arrival in Shanghai
  • Britannica Online Open Day, an Access to an Offer Letter Now

RSS anthro{dendum}

  • Why “is this fascism?” is the wrong question: a foray into the everyday life of political concepts
  • An Obituary for Alfred Kroeber (or…Can American Indians Speak?)

Men’s Lacrosse at Davidson

The Davidson College Men's Lacrosse team is a member of the Southeastern Lacrosse Conference (SELC) and competes in Division II of the Men's Collegiate Lacrosse Association.

Tweets by @thefieldworker

Copyright © 2021 Eriberto P. Lozada Jr. · Davidson College